What to Look for When Comparing UV Sterilization Devices

Author: Steve

May. 13, 2024

What to Look for When Comparing UV Sterilization Devices

For more information, please visit our website.

UV sterilization is a fast-growing and invaluable option for preventing the spread of healthcare-associated infections, or HAIs. While you may have questions when it comes to what UV sterilization is and what it can do for your healthcare facility, there is no doubt that UV sterilization is incredibly effective in killing infectious bacteria, viruses, and fungi.

UV sterilization provides a sanitary workspace and is an incredibly powerful disinfectant, but it can be confusing to figure out which UV sterilization device is the right choice for you and your facility. This guide will help you understand what factors to consider when comparing devices, and what device will help you protect your staff and patients best.

Why Use UV Sterilization?

UV sterilization is not a new technology, having been discovered in 1879. Discovered to be a useful technology for cleaning infectious spaces, more studies were done to determine the exact beneficial nature of UV for sterilization purposes. Since the 20th century, UV sterilization has been used to disinfect things like water and work surfaces. UV light is a shorter wavelength than visible light, and is able to penetrate and destroy the bodies of viruses and bacteria.

The use of UV sterilization, or ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, has been found to be extremely effective. Sources of UV sterilization can kill over 99% of viruses, bacteria, and fungi in an extremely short amount of time. Due to this effectiveness, various types of UV treatments and specialized UV devices for sterilization have been developed. This can make it difficult to determine what kind of UV device provides the best results for your facility.

Where Can UV be Used?

While UV sterilization can be used as a supplemental infection control strategy for almost any situation, such as disinfecting water and work surfaces as mentioned above, the efficiency of the sterilization make other specialized spaces accessible as well.

One of the best and fastest growing spaces for UV utilization is in hospital construction and renovation. Keeping hospital worksites from spreading pathogens to other patients is key for infection control solutions. UV sterilization techniques help provide a standard that can be hard for manual cleaning to meet. By providing a consistent procedure for disinfection, UV sterilization in hospitals is invaluable.

The efficient use of UV sterilization makes it more than a trend in hospital disinfection and cleaning practices. However, when looking at devices, it is important to find one that is able to meet your needs, however large or small the scale may be. Recent studies have found that the size of the device often isn’t a factor in the effectiveness of the sterilization itself. Rather, there are other factors play a more important role in the value of your UV sterilization device.

How Can UV be Utilized?

Beyond water and surface sterilization, UV can be used as a sterilization technique for other types of disinfection. UV can disinfect the air in isolated spaces, which is particularly beneficial in a hospital setting. Installing UV devices like lamps and lights at the top of rooms and other areas of circulation can disinfect the air as it moves, improving both the air quality and the effectiveness of the UV sterilization.

UV can also sterilize equipment in work spaces. Because UV sterilization isn’t a wet solution like other disinfectants that can leave behind residue, it can be used as a more efficient solution for ensuring that equipment and instruments are effectively cleaned. And, as mentioned before, it can help improve the consistency of cleaning and disinfecting by removing elements of human error that arise with manual cleaning solutions.

Because of the wide range of uses for UV sterilization, determining which device can provide the best solution depends on what type of project you are working on. Keeping in mind that you may want to use your UV sterilization device for multiple disinfection situations, narrowing down what type of utility you need from your device can help you determine the best pick.

What Type of UV Light is Best?

Most UV sterilization devices use UVC light as the source of their disinfecting power. UVC light is an effective solution for sterilization, which is why it is the most widely used light type. However, it can cause some serious damage as well. UVC light can penetrate human skin and cause damage or injury to the person using it, if not careful. UVC light can also cause damage to certain plastics and rubber materials over time.

A better light solution is the UV-FORCE® technology. UV-FORCE uses far-UVC, a different wavelength of the UVC spectrum to provide the same disinfecting strength as UV-C without the dangerous side effects. Far-UVC can also work faster and disinfect more quickly than other disinfecting methods, creating greater efficiency. A recent study confirms what far-UVC promises in terms of safety to people in the workspace, affirming that far-UVC cannot penetrate the skin and cause harm to humans.

Related links:
What is UV Disinfection System of Water - Waterdrop

UVDF supply professional and honest service.

Far-UVC is safer for workplace cleanup as well as for human safety. Many regular far-UVC lamps and lights contain mercury in the bulbs, which make disposal hazardous and much more complicated. Far-UVC doesn’t use mercury, and therefore is safer to use and to dispose of.

When picking the right UV sterilizing device, the type of light used in the device is the most important factor in determining which device is the right one for your project. Because of its increased efficiency and improved safety, equipment like our Airborne Disinfection Module with UV-FORCE® and GermBuster Room Air Purifier with UV-FORCE® can be incredible tools for sterilization and disinfection. For more information about the far-UVC light, download our guide.

More resources:

  

Performance Study of a Sterilization Box Using ...

In this study, a cost-effective sterilization box is developed and the synergistic effect of UV and temperature over sanitization was examined. For this purpose, the effect of UV and heat sanitization was performed, and its effect on glycoprotein viz., IgG and bacterial cells were observed. The detailed results are described in the sequel.

3.1. Effect of heat and UV treatment over IgG

The effects of temperature alone and UV incubation along with temperature were analyzed on IgG model protein. The hydrodynamic size of the native IgG was found to be ~5 nm, in agreement with the literature (Hawe et al., 2011). The absorbance of native IgG was 0.172, which corresponded to 0.1 mg/mL of IgG using Beer Lambert's law (Reader et al., 2019). The effects of varying temperature and combined UV and temperature with time were evaluated at the conditions suggested by Design-Expert software (). For this purpose, the absorbance values at 280 nm and hydrodynamic sizes were measured after treating the protein at different temperatures with and without UV as discussed in Section 2.3. The responses (hydrodynamic size and absorbance) at these conditions are shown in . In the figure, unfilled symbols pertain to heat only and filled symbol correspond to heat with UV-C.

The absorbance values at 280 nm were found to increase with the increase in temperature above 70 °C. Protein solution incubated at 76.21 °C exhibited the maximum absorbance value of 0.94 within 10 min followed by absorbance at 70 °C. The increase in absorbance is related to the exposure of aromatic amino acids present in IgG because of the conformational changes (Sharma and Pandey, 2021). The denaturation temperatures of IgG is reported as 61 and 71 °C (Vermeer and Norde, 2000). Moreover, the melting point, Tm of the IgG was found to be 69 °C (Martin et al., 2014); hence, the observed increase in the absorbance values indicated the deformation in the IgG's native conformation. However, the effect of time was found not to be significant below the temperature of 70 °C.

Similar to the absorbance values at a higher temperature, the hydrodynamic sizes of the IgG protein was found to increase with the increase in temperature and time of exposure. The increase in the hydrodynamic size at a higher temperature indicated the unfolding (increase in the size) of IgG at elevated temperatures (Martin et al., 2014; Zhang and Topp, 2012). IgG incubated at 76.21 °C under UV incubation resulted in the maximum hydrodynamic size of 309.02 nm (); at the same temperature without UV the hydrodynamic size was found to be lower i.e., 293.93 nm (). It indicates the significant role of UV incubation on the unfolding/denaturation of the IgG at elevated temperatures (Zhang and Topp, 2012). It has been observed that a 4 W UV-C lamp under 0.930–0.932 mW/cm2 and 65 °C dry heat for 20 min was sufficient to inactivate the entire swine coronavirus from N95 mask surfaces (Chotiprasitsakul et al., 2020). In the present study, two 11 W UV-C lamps resulted in the unfolding of IgG protein.

The effect of temperature below a critical time was found not to be significant at the conditions selected in this study. Similarly, the effect of time up to 15 min was also ineffective below a critical temperature. Hence, model equations relating input variables with the responses as predicted by Design-Expert software were not significant. However, the experimental data were fitted to a sigmoidal expression as shown in A (dotted line). The data fitted very well with R2 value of 0.99. The critical point (lag time) was estimated from the sigmoidal expression and was found to be 70 ± 1 °C. This temperature also agreed to the denaturation temperatures of IgG (Vermeer et al., 1998). Therefore, a temperature of 70 °C appears to be optimal for the unfolding of this model glycoprotein. It has been reported that unfolding/conformation changes of the surface glycoprotein of a virus leads to its disintegration and finally its inactivation (Hsu et al., 2011). The loss of viral surface protein due to external factors like a higher temperature and the strong surface-protein interactions disintegrates the virus assembly (Liu et al., 2015; Pandey, 2020b). It is also observed that UV-C light enhances the hydrodynamic size, but not drastically. Heat alone can perform well in the denaturation of IgG. ( B Absorbance280 of IgG at various conditions.)

To examine the combined effect of heat and UV treatments on the conformational changes of IgG, the intrinsic fluorescence values were recorded by exciting the protein at 290 nm and the emission values were scanned from 300 nm to 450 nm. The intrinsic fluorescence is produced due to the presence of aromatic amino acids (monomers) of the protein. The native IgG exhibited the maxima at 327 nm, whereas a peak-shift was observed at 332 nm and 331 nm at 76.21 °C for 10 min and 70 °C for 15 min, respectively (A). This indicates the unfolding and deformation in the native structure of the IgG at temperatures above a critical temperature of 70 °C (Arfat et al., 2014; Pandey, 2020b). Further, in the case of combined UV and heat exposure, the maximum fluorescence intensity was observed at 70 °C for 15 min (B). This indicates the synergistic effective role of UV in the unfolding and conformational changes in the IgG structure (Arfat et al., 2014). All these results suggested that the incubation of heat and UV together at 70 °C for 15 min unfolds the glycoprotein to a required extent and can be useful for the inactivation of viruses for sanitization purposes.

Further, the conformation changes of the combined heat and UV treated IgG at the above optimized condition (70 °C for 15 min) were analyzed as compared to the native IgG using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. The FTIR spectra of native and heat treated IgG are shown in , which were de-convoluted and the area of de-convoluted peaks have been used to deduce the contents of the secondary structure (Sharma et al., 2020). The contents of α-helix, β-sheet and β-turn in native IgG were found to be 32, 55 and 13%, respectively, which agreed with the reported data (Hasan et al., 2018). In the case of heat treated IgG, the contents of β-sheet increased to 70% and α-helix decreased to 22%. This complemented the DLS, absorbance and fluorescence data.

Are you interested in learning more about uv sterilization device? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!

99

0

Comments

Please Join Us to post.

0/2000

All Comments ( 0 )

Guest Posts

If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!

Your Name: (required)

Your Email: (required)

Subject:

Your Message: (required)