Apr. 14, 2025
Through our research, and backed up by our firsthand testing, we found that a good general use duct tape should be around 11 milli-inches (mil) thick, use a natural rubber-based adhesive, and be made using a co-extrusion process.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website Dewangtai.
Before getting into these specifics, it helps to know a bit about the three ingredients that make up a piece of duct tape: a polyethylene sheet backing, a cloth grid, and a rubber-based adhesive.
The polyethylene sheet plays two roles: It serves as a bonding area for the other two ingredients and creates a waterproof backing. It’s basically a sheet of plastic.
The cloth grid (or scrim)—typically made of polyester or a cotton/polyester blend—decides the tape’s strength, flexibility, and tearability. The threads that run the length of the tape are what give it its material strength—how much weight the tape can hold before breaking. The threads that run across the tape determine its tearability. Duct tape tears along the thread line, so the smaller the space between threads, the cleaner the tear. If the threads are far apart, getting a straight, even tear is difficult. It’s like holding one edge of a piece of paper while trying to rip it down the center.
All true duct tape has a rubber-based adhesive, but each tape has its own adhesive recipe. Some are thicker and flow better in order to stick to rough porous surfaces, while others are stiffer, making them more stable for extreme temperatures and flat surfaces. As we found out in our testing, some adhesives are so gooey that they’ll melt in the hot sun. Some tapes are made with alternatives to rubber-based glues, but those tapes (often made with what’s known as hot melt adhesive) are less reliable in extreme temperatures, and they don’t have the strength of the rubber-based glues, so we dismissed those.
Coextruded tapes are better because they won’t delaminate. After many conversations with four prominent duct tape manufacturers (and confirmed through our testing), we’re convinced a process called coextrusion is the best way to assemble these three ingredients. The defining characteristic of coextrusion is that the polyethylene sheet enters the manufacturing process in molten form. This means that when the cloth grid is added, it melts directly into the plastic, forming a single, fully bonded piece. The rubber adhesive is then applied to one side, creating what we know as duct tape.
The other way to make duct tape is called lamination. It’s easier to do, but there are issues with the finished product. As Hillary DuMoulin, communications manager at Berry Plastics, explained to us, lamination involves pressing all three ingredients together. The cloth grid is held to the poly either by a separate laminating adhesive or the “squish-through” method, where the rubber-based adhesive holds everything together.
The problem with lamination is the poly/scrim connection is nowhere near as secure as it is with the coextrusion method. Air bubbles can form between the laminated layers. Over time, particularly during exterior use, the poly and scrim can come apart. If you’ve ever pulled off an old piece of duct tape and the cloth grid remained stuck in a crusty bed of adhesive, you’ve seen the major flaw of a laminated tape. With a co-extruded tape, the scrim is really an internal component of the poly, so this kind of separation doesn’t occur.
There are visual ways to distinguish a laminated tape from a co-extruded one. The most telling is that co-extruded tapes have very small, clearly defined dimples on the exterior of the roll. These correspond with gaps in the cloth grid and represent all of the places where potential air bubbles could form if the tape were laminated. It’s harder to see on high-end tapes because as the tape quality increases, the grid gets smaller and dimples become difficult for the eye to pick up.
Another way to visually tell the difference is that laminated tapes (at least the two that we tested) have a wrinkled texture. On one tape, the ridges were so extreme that we were unable to get it to sit flat against any surface for more than a day or so. Co-extruded tapes have a nice smooth finish.
For thickness, we found that tapes in the 11-mil range offered the best compromise between strength and maneuverability. Thickness is measured in “mils” (or milli-inches, roughly . millimeters) and tapes vary from as thin as 3 mils to as thick as 17 mils. Thinner tapes are too floppy to handle. Trying to wrap a thin, flimsy, wet noodle piece of duct tape can become a frustrating experience as it constantly folds over and sticks to itself. Once this happens, especially if it’s adhesive to adhesive, it’s pretty much a permanent bond, so you have to discard the piece and start over.
Big, thick tapes have drawbacks. The beefier they are, the less flexibility and conformity they have. During testing, we found that this negative outweighed the added strength of the really thick tapes, like the 17-mil Gorilla. Those tapes are extremely strong, but it’s very difficult to wrap a piece around a contoured surface (like the floppy sole on an old work boot, or the 90-degree elbow of a copper water pipe). This lack of flexibility also causes problems if you’re bundling something together with the tape. It’s much better if you can give the tape a strong pull and add a little stretch to it as you’re adhering it. This little bit of flexibility, which tapes around 11-mil usually have, can add just enough tension to secure the whole bundle together. This kind of stretching is nearly impossible to do with a thick 17-mil tape.
Other handling characteristics play a role in performance. Berry Plastics’ Hillary DuMoulin, told us that tearability, “finger tack,” and the ability to unwind are all important in evaluating duct tape. So during testing, we took these factors into account as well.
What’s not as important are width and length. The standard roll of duct tape is 2 inches wide (it actually measures around 1.88 inches but is always referred to as 2 inches). Other sizes are available, but even after 10 years in the construction industry, I’ve never needed anything more than a 2-inch roll. The lengths of the rolls are also standardized. The rolls I looked at were a variety of 35, 40, 45, and 60 yards. (45 and 60 yards are the most common lengths.)
Good, high-quality tapes designed for general purpose sit in the $8 to $15 range. You can get cheap and poorly made stuff for less, but it’s not worth saving the couple bucks unless it’s for a really simple and temporary job like sealing garbage bags or wrapping rolls of pulled-up carpeting. You can also get more aggressive tapes loaded with turbo strength and crazy adhesive that can cost over $20, but you probably don’t need that strength and you definitely don’t need the frustration that comes with working with tape that’s too thick and too sticky.
There is a dizzying variety of available duct tapes. Berry Plastics alone sells roughly 35 different types of duct tape under the Nashua and Polyken names—so after our research, we asked the major brands (Intertape, Duck, Scotch, Nashua, and Polyken) to suggest their best product for general all-around use. To give them a sense of what we had in mind, we gave the examples of patching a bike seat, repairing a backpack, and fixing a leak in a hose. Each company came back to us with a tape in the 9-to-11–mil range. In addition, we tested a number of tapes from these manufacturers based on reputation and customer feedback. These were typically thicker tapes and ones that tended to have specific strengths (and, as we discovered, specific weaknesses). We originally tested a total of 10 tapes and have since looked at a few more.
We really thumped on these tapes in order to decide on the best. We did this through a battery of structured and unstructured tests that measured adhesive strength, material strength, heat resistance, flexibility, and conformability. We then tested the long-term durability of the tapes by abandoning four sample boards in a south-facing New England field for seven months.
We tested the material strength of the tapes. We started with an 18-inch piece and wrapped one end around a piece of wood. We connected the other side to a come-along (this is a come-along, if that’s a new term to you) attached to a hanging scale. Then we stood on the piece of wood and cranked the come-along until the tape broke. We experimented with a number of other ways to do this, but the come-along exerted nice and even pressure on the tape and gave us the most consistent results.
We used a similar test for adhesive strength. But instead of wrapping the piece around a piece of wood, we adhered the final 2 inches of it to a piece of poplar. For the masonry test, we used the same setup but attached the 2 inches to a cinder block.
We tested each tape’s adhesion to itself, but it didn’t matter. In every case, the adhesion level surpasses that of the material strength and the tape broke before peeling away. Duct tape loves to stick to itself.
We tried to reduce variables in testing. We performed all structured strength tests at least three times per tape to eliminate the human factor as much as possible. Each test was run during a single day continuously until completion, so humidity and temperature were constant throughout.
We used glass to test adhesion to smooth surfaces. One tape strips were stuck to a sheet of glass, we heated them with a heat gun to a temperature of 150 degrees and then pulled them off. This also gave a sense of how much residue each tape leaves behind.
We tested the tapes on painted wood. For another general adhesion test, we took a painted piece of wood, applied tape samples to it, waited a day, and tore them off to see which tapes took paint with them. There’s such a thing as being “too sticky.”
And we pretended to fix a glove. To look at the conformability of each tape, we used the tapes to wrap pine cones, as if you were patching the finger on a glove.
Lastly, we spent seven months testing long term exposure to weather. We put four sample boards in a south-facing field and left them for seven months to bake in the sun and get buried by snow and hail. On one of them, identical-length pieces of each tape were holding up squares of 6-mil poly on a sheet of OSB plywood. On another board, they were holding blocks of wood. The final two sample boards are just strips of duct tape adhered directly to plywood and to a sheet of poly. The samples spent a total of seven months in the field and experienced significant rain, wind, heat above 90 degrees, and snow and cold below 0 degrees (“one of the coldest winters in 20 years,” according to Accuweather).
Once we started testing, it didn’t take long to realize that the thicker specialty tapes (Gorilla, Nashua 357, Sticky Ass, T-Rex, and Polyken 231) operate in an entirely different realm from the others. In many cases, the numbers we were getting from those tapes were double of what the others were (adhesive strength, material strength, and so on). But these numbers don’t tell the whole story—each of these stronger tapes, with the exception of Sticky Ass, had at least one characteristic that eliminated it as a general-use tape.
BrandThicknessMaterial strengthAdhesion (wood)Adhesion (masonry)Duck Advanced9 mils38 lbs.38 lbs.28 lbs.Scotch All-Weather9 mils51 lbs.47 lbs.38 lbs.Intertape AC mils45 lbs.45 lbs.35 lbs.Nashua mils46 lbs.46 lbs.46 lbs.Duck Max Strength11.5 mils62 lbs.50 lbs.56 lbs.Polyken mils85 lbs.85 lbs.66 lbs.Sticky Ass Tape13 mils80 lbs.80 lbs.50 lbs.Nashua mils88 lbs.88 lbs.77 lbs.T-Rex17 mils80 lbs.64 lbs.74 lbs.Gorilla17 mils101 lbs.89 lbs.82 lbs.Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENTDuck Max Strength sticks to most anything, tears off the roll neatly, and stays stiff enough to not flop onto itself yet flexible enough to wrap around corners or an uneven surface.
After all of the research and testing, we found that Duck Max Strength has the most balanced attributes of any of the tested tapes, making it the best choice for the most tasks and a true general-purpose duct tape. Compared to the other general-use tapes we tested, it has the strongest adhesive and the highest material strength, yet at 11.5 mils, it still has a lot of flexibility and is easy to wrap around curved or uneven objects, like the finger of a glove or a battered pair of work boots. It also has some stretch, so it tightly forms against sharp corners and edges. But even with this flexibility, it’s still thick enough that it doesn’t constantly flop over on itself during use. It has great adherence to a wide range of surfaces, including wood, glass, poly and concrete. It unwinds easily from the roll and tears in a nice, clean, straight line with no annoying strands unwinding along the outer edge.
Duck Max Strength is a co-extruded tape. During all of our testing, it never showed any signs of delamination or other structural failings. It lays nice and flat, and it’s easy to get a good seal along the edges.
It consistently got very high marks in strength testing. This was especially the case with material strength and adhesion to masonry. In those categories, it was at least 10 pounds stronger than the next tape. Adhesion to wood was a closer competition, but Duck still won out. It also held to the piece of glass better than the rest.
It can hold a lot. Duck Max Strength has a material strength of 62 pounds, so a doubled-up piece should be able to hold upwards of 120 pounds (and a tripled piece 180 pounds). That’s a lot of weight, and we feel that that’s more than enough for what people generally do with duct tape. The special-use duct tapes all had higher numbers, topped by the 101 pounds of Gorilla, but those tapes had other failings.
We’ve continued to use and still like it. These original tests were done in , and in the ensuing years, we’ve continued to use Duck Max Strength and have never found it lacking for regular around-the-house fixes and patches.
An example from early shows the typical kind of performance we’ve seen: After a month securing some loose Christmas lights wires to an old galvanized gutter in Los Angeles—enduring rainstorms, harsh sunshine, and high winds in the meantime—several scraps of Duck tape, torn into stingily small postage stamp sized squares, all held their positions tenaciously, requiring a forceful tug to dislodge in mid-January.
Sticky Ass Tape is harder to tear and isn’t as flexible, but it’s very effective for outdoor uses like temporarily repairing a hole in your gutter.
Duct tape should generally be looked at as a temporary fix. But if you’re someone who tends to use it for long-term solutions, particularly outdoors, we recommend picking up a roll of Sticky Ass Tape. Among the tapes, this one did the best in all of the exterior testing, and after seven months of sitting in a field, it was the only tape that was still attached to all four sample boards. This is the one to choose for a semi-permanent patch on a hole in your gutter, the rusted-out spot in the truck bed, a fix for a busted lawn rake, or a crack in the recycling bin.
It’s great for the outdoors. Sticky Ass doesn’t have the raw strength of some of the other tapes that we looked at, but on the exterior sample boards it had no parallel. After six weeks, the piece of Sticky Ass on the plywood was still 100 percent adhered. All of the other tapes had at least one corner or edge coming loose. The same was true for the pieces holding up the poly square. Here, the Sticky Ass hadn’t moved, while the others had all either fallen, shifted, or had at least one area loosen.
After seven months, the results were even more dramatic. Of the 10 tapes, the only two still holding the poly squares to the sheet of OSB plywood were the Sticky Ass and T-Rex. The adhesive on the Sticky Ass had melted some and the poly had slid about a quarter-inch, but it still held firm. Most of the other tapes lost their hold around month four or five, with Scotch All-Weather holding on until month six. The most telling sample board was the one with strips of tape adhered fully to plywood. On this board, Sticky Ass and Gorilla were still fully adhered, while the others were either gone or show dramatic curling, usually along the top edge.
It’s thick and strong. At 13 mil, Sticky Ass is a thicker tape than Duck Max Strength and is stronger in almost every category. The one area where Duck Max Strength was better was in adhesion to masonry, but that was only by a small margin.
It can be a little hard to handle. The trade-offs for all of this extreme weather durability are handling issues. The 13-mil Sticky Ass is tough to tear, and once a piece is torn off, it’s extremely difficult to rip it again into two smaller pieces. It also doesn’t conform to uneven surfaces as well as thinner tapes. For most jobs, we found ourselves reaching for the easier-to-use Duck Max instead.
The 15-mil IronForce Heavy Duty Duct Tape was stiff and difficult to conform to curves and other oddly shaped objects (like the boots we tried repairing). The adhesive was strong, but not enough to make up for the loss of handling.
Nashua’s 398 was the most like Duck Max, but it’s just not as strong. It appears to be hampered by its own structural strength. In both of the adhesion tests, the tape broke before pulling away from the material. On the plus side, the 398 tears well and wraps well. It also holds up to heat and wind almost as well as the Duck.
Intertape AC36, an 11-mil laminated tape, didn’t excel in any of the tests, coming in behind both Duck Max Strength, Nashua 398, and the 9-mil Scotch every time. It comes off the roll smoothly, but it’s difficult to get a nice crisp tear. Instead the tape would wrinkle, stretch, and pucker at the rip line, leaving a ragged edge.
Scotch’s 9-mil All-Weather is the other laminated tape that we looked at. Despite its relative thinness, it proved to be stronger than some of the 11-mil tapes, but it has too many other drawbacks. Fresh off the roll, the air pockets in the adhesive are visible. After two weeks, when we removed the tape samples from a plywood board, the Scotch was coming apart, with a significant amount of the mesh separating from the poly backing and adhesive. The Scotch also had the most occurrences of stringy tears. The tape came off the roll heavily wrinkled and could not sit flat or get a nice seal along the edge. These wrinkles create pockets where wind or rain can penetrate into the tape—we hit one of the sample boards with a hose at medium pressure and the Scotch came right off, while all of the other tapes remained on the board.
Duck Advanced is also a 9-mil tape, but it felt much thinner than the Scotch, possibly because of the lack of wrinkles. This one wasn’t nearly as strong as the others and it wasn’t that durable outdoors. After about a week and a half, the strips holding the poly square let go. It was extremely flexible and by far the easiest to wrap, but it was so floppy that it often flopped over on itself.
For more information, please visit Duct Tape Wholesale .
There’s no question that Gorilla Tape had the strongest adhesive layered on top of the strongest mesh. It took the top spot in every single strength test (except for glass). It blew away the competition when it came to material strength, scoring almost 15 pounds higher than the next best and being the only tape to break the hundred-pound mark. But the fact is that a 17-mil tape isn’t very malleable at all. Gorilla is so thick that wrapping the pine cone and getting a perfect seal was almost impossible. It is also too stiff to wrap tight around a corner. Gorilla is also not that easy to tear. It’s certainly not a dealbreaker, but once you’ve ripped as much tape as we have, you’ll understand just how much more difficult the 17-mil tapes were. If you have limited hand strength, you’re better off with a thinner tape.
The 17-mil T-Rex Tape, made by Shurtape (the parent company of Duck), is positioned as a direct competitor to Gorilla, even down to the terrifying animal mascot. The T-Rex tears easier than Gorilla, but that’s about the only category where it gets the edge. In every strength test, Gorilla was stronger. If we wanted strong tape bragging rights, we’d opt for Gorilla instead.
Nashua 357 is the tape that the Mythbusters used to build a bridge and lift a car. In our tests, it proved itself to be nearly as strong as Gorilla, but with the added handling of a 13-mil tape. Nashua described the 357 as having a thick adhesive with a viscosity that allows it to easily ‘flow’ over uneven surfaces. We thought this tape was a sure winner. But during our third week of exterior testing, there was a three-day heat wave with two days in the low 90s and a final day in the high 80s. During that time, the piece of 357 that was holding the block of wood began to shift and slide downward. Then the block of wood disengaged from the tape and fell. None of the other tapes moved at all; only the 357’s gooey adhesive was affected by the heat.
Polyken 231 Military Grade had the most distinctive adhesive of the tested tapes. It isn’t necessarily the strongest, but it had an incredible tack. It was the only tape that actually started to hurt our fingers after prolonged use. Polyken explained to us that the very stiff adhesive performs well in extreme temperatures and excels on flat surfaces. They also said that it is not ideal on rough surfaces because there is no ‘looseness’ to the glue and it wouldn’t be able to ooze into the uneven surfaces. Our test results reflected this. The Polyken was by far the stickiest on glass (even more than Gorilla), but it started losing its tack on the OSB plywood sooner than the rest and fell off during the fifth week. The stiffness of the adhesive was also evident when we pulled the sample off the painted board. The Polyken was the only tape that pulled any paint off, and it pulled it all off. Every last bit.
We’ve tested and reviewed all of the major duct tape brands to find the best duct tape for an emergency or survival situation. A few household brands made the cut, as well as some battle-tested brands I’m familiar with from the military and some industrial strength brands we engineers like to use.
Duct tape is just one of those things that everyone needs and already has. It is easy to use, cheap, and can fix pretty much anything around the house. That roll of silver tape has probably helped you out of several jams already in your life, but when it comes to survival you want the best for the job. There are several types and brands to pick from, so you have plenty of options when you are adding rolls to your survival kit.
This is where we come in. We’ve researched the best duct tapes, tested them in the elements, and the results are in: the overall best performer, our budget pick, and an upgrade option. If you need tape that won’t let you down in an emergency, one of our suggestions will keep you rolling.
Contents (Jump to a Section)
The tape with the gorilla on it came out in , made by the same Ohio company that brought us Gorilla Glue. It was stickier and stronger than most hardware store duct tapes but maintained the same flexibility. Now you can find Gorilla Tape and knockoffs (like T-Rex tape) everywhere and it’s still better than the competitors in terms of value, strength, tackiness, and durability.
Good tape has been around for a while (see our upgrade pick), but Gorilla brands made it cheap and accessible to all of us by mass-producing it. You can now get Gorilla Tape in a wide range of widths, roll lengths, colors, and package quantities. I especially appreciate the Gorilla Tape Handy Roll, because it fits perfectly in any kit: 1 inch wide and 30 feet long, the roll is much smaller and lighter than a full roll of standard duct tape. The handy roll is less than $5, so you can stash it everywhere for dirt cheap: tool bag, survival kit, etc.
Your standard silver duct tape got a big upgrade with Duck MAX Strength. Stronger and stickier, but still easy to tear makes this tape a great value. The price certainly lets you stock up: one roll is 45 yards of reinforced tape that is extruded through the hot melt adhesive.
Duck (made by Shurtape Technologies) added MAX to their catalog as they saw their customers needing stronger tape than traditional duct tape. They hit the nail right on the head since this tape gets all of it done at the best price.
Just the smell of this duct tape takes me back to my military days. Our HAZMAT team would stick it on everything- gas mask carriers, vehicles, people, plastic sheeting, etc. We went through it like crazy but never really considered the cost. It never failed in the field, and it was no surprise that it outperformed the other tapes in our tests. It does cost more than our other selections, but it also outperforms them and is battle-tested. If you could have one roll and only one roll for any emergency, Nashua 357 Premium is the tape you want.
Nashua and Polyken are both produced by the same company out of Kentucky. They are well known by contractors and military logistics since their tapes are popular with the pros. This tape is rated 40-200 degrees Fahrenheit and has a tensile strength of 50 pounds per square inch.
Our research narrowed the field down to the several tapes and brands that we tested: Duck, Gorilla, Nashua, Scotch, T-Rex, Polyken, and more. This helped us eliminate some of the tapes that just are not a good value.
There is not a large number of brands that make duct tape, but there are several types of tape for specific applications. For example, Polyken and Nashua (a few of the military favorite brands) are made by the same company. But each of those make over a dozen types of tapes for different environments or applications. For survival purposes, we stuck to looking at general-use tape which narrowed everything down a bit.
We also steered clear of any decorative duct tape (looking at you, Duck brands!), because it is just not optimized for emergencies or survival. Of course, if you happen to have those during an emergency, they are better than nothing. You may also find some uses for some of their high-visibility tapes in an emergency for signaling or marking.
The best duct tapes have several important features to look for:
When you get the right blend of these, you can find an unmatched tape that will help you tackle almost any obstacle during an emergency or disaster. Below, we break down what each of these features means for a great survival tape.
The amount of money you can spend on duct tape can get a little silly. Sure, the performance of the tape in our tests was directly correlated with cost- but the exceptions are where you get the best bang for your buck.
Our top pick focuses on performance first and foremost, but our budget pick performed very closely to our top pick in this case. If you are looking to save a few dollars on your survival loadout or emergency kit, our budget pick for duct tape is a good opportunity.
You never want to spend too much money on one resource, especially tape. Using your money to get the most functionality and versatility out of your survival kit is the smart way to go. There is a sweet spot where you get high value out of the best functionality with not too high of a price, which is where our top pick sits.
Different tapes use different amounts and strengths of adhesive and even different types of adhesive.
The stickiness of the adhesive needs to be backed up with strong material, or the tape will just degrade or shred under any force, even though the tacky adhesive will stay put. Manufacturers have found clever ways to address this.
Extruding the tape material through the adhesive is one of the main ways tape manufacturers have found to increase the material strength, but keep the tape’s pliability. The thickness of the tape itself affects the tear and shear strength the most, but too thick makes the tape difficult to work with- you may need a knife to cut the tape rather than tearing it by hand.
Many tapes have different properties across the roll versus down the roll. This makes the tape easier to tear and bend across its width but much harder to tear down the length.
Some specialty duct tapes are made very thick, so they are much less flexible. If you try to adhere them to a sharp angle, or even a 90-degree angle, the stiffness of the tape makes it actually less likely to adhere. The flexibility of duct tape makes it so versatile in many applications- stiff tape isn’t great for patching clothes, lashing poles together, etc.
To keep flexibility and strength, a grid of material is usually used to hold the structure and glue of the tape together.
Duct tape, in and of itself, is pretty darn versatile. There are a few things that make duct tape even more versatile, and we’ve touched on a few of them above. Your standard ‘general purpose’ flexible duct tape is great because it lets you use it virtually anywhere. It may not be as strong as some of the specialty tapes, but you can use it for almost anything.
Duct tape can also come in different colors, patterns, roll lengths, and roll widths. Black and OD Green are great for general survival use, but high visibility colors are great for marking gear, paths on the go, or signaling. Small rolls of 1″ wide tape is great for smaller kits, like EDC loadouts.
When SHTF, duct tape is one of the first things out and getting to work. You can fix stuff, make cordage, mark bug out routes, patch clothes, make containers- the list is virtually endless. Here are just a few of my favorite survival uses:
I’m not the only one in the world who pushes the importance of duct tape for emergency use. The boys over at Sensible Prepper (Sootch) do a pretty good job of laying out their ideas:
Duct tape has so many uses that it is found in most survival kits. Everyone has used some version of it: it is cheap, easy to use, and effective for plenty of situations, emergencies, and disasters. Duct tape is an essential part of a shelter-in-place kit (which basically consists of tape and plastic).
Duct tape is an important part of these kits:
It is also suggested for these kits:
No matter what threats come your way, duct tape is always nice to have around so you can handle a survival situation.
All of our experience and the testing done to determine the best duct tape are useless without listing our research sources and references. We leaned on these for the book knowledge that we paired with our hands-on testing and practical military and prepping experience:
Wenner, R., et al. (). Duct Tape for the Treatment of Common Warts in Adults: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Dermatol. Volume 143. Issue 3. Pages 309 – 313. (Source).
Kapila, T., et al. (). Methods for Separating Duct Tape. Journal of Forensic Identification. Volume 62. Issue 3. Pages 215 – 226. (Source).
Sorensen, J. (). Will Duct Tape and Plastic Really Work? Issues Related to Expedient Shelter-In-Place. US DOE: Office of Scientific and Technical Information. (Source).
Duct tape may seem like a basic and insignificant tool, but it is easy to use and extremely useful in a lot of situations. The uses of duct tape for survival are endless, and it is just one of those tools that is always nice to have around- even for non-emergencies.
Besides duct tape, there are a few other common tools you should consider for survival:
We presented quite a lot of information, but as always: if you have any questions let us know and we would be happy to help. Our research and testing found that Gorilla Tape is the best option given its value, adhesive properties, material strength, and versatility. Duct tape is easy and simple to use, but it doesn’t hurt to get it out every once in a while if you plan on relying on it in an emergency.
Some of the higher-strength duct tapes don’t handle the same as your run-of-the-mill silver rolls. Don’t let your tools sit in your bag or kit indefinitely- get them out and get familiar with them by using them.
Keep exploring, stay prepared, and be safe.
The company is the world’s best Bulk Duck Tape supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.
Previous: None
Next: High Quality Shiny Glitter Clothing Golden Scallion Heat ...
If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!
All Comments ( 0 )